Recent Posts

Showing posts with label silhouette. Show all posts
Showing posts with label silhouette. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

i wanna be next to you



snagging the chance to take my shorts out for some sunning. these were bought probably more than a year ago. my most expensive haul from a local blogshop's arrived. it's the shoes that caused a substantial part of the damage. turned out they're jellies. not as pointy as i'd like them to be. they seem to be tight during daytime (but they came with a pair of shoe liners). i chose the other black-and-gold pair over the new shoes.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

those days


wearing socks was intentional. reason: i was visiting the big boss' place; there'd be many other colleagues there, so i was shy about exposing my ugly feet. and since i haven't figured out how to wear such socks with skirts or dresses, i wore the jeggings, which're tight. i thought i'd lost weight (someone observed so and i could fit into my cheongsam comfortably). jeggings and socks weren't exactly advisable in today's heat.

wearing the hasbeens lookalike wasn't that intentional. it was between a pair of maroon 9wests and the naturalizers (or is it more like hasbeens resemble naturalizers?). i got in and out of a few outfits before  settling for this one. the tunic's never worn. so you see, there's no point in buying new clothes for CNYs. lol. anyway, the granny shoes looked better. truth be told, i'd prefer to wear the 9wests. reason: i didn't wish to look typical. i mean, everyone seemed to be doing vintage these days. i was honestly not keen on looking too common.




ever since i entered the blogging world, i'd gradually toned down the vintage vibe in the way i dressed.  and i wasn't already doing full-blown vintage in the first place. the naturalizers had been ignored for sometime now. and frankly, wearing socks with such shoes could be potentially embarrassing. i'm not talking about being teased for looking like a granny. you know how socks could be slippery? now go imagine the scenes of embarrassment.

but i know it's self-contradicting. think about it: some, or many of us, would like to declare that we don't like to be slaves to trends. so we invest in classic clothing items. so there're many of us who'd end up looking exactly like each other. and isn't classic = vintage?     

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

shake your love


who's still using a scrunchie today? heard on radio Yaz's phone interview with Debbie Gibson. again, shoulder pads were mentioned. and hair, iirc. (she's so boring! :P) if the 80s were about cockroach hair and shoulder pads, then what about the 90s? i suspect it's still the hair and something to do with shoulders. 

what's your favourite song by Gibson, if you must choose? i still do like Lost in Your Eyes. her voice is quite 'covered' whereas you can hear more 'power' from Tiffany. altho sometimes i don't sense any emotion in the latter's voice. excuse my layman's lingo.

FP can also denote Fashion Police. hur hur. my gums and throat hurt. 

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails